Skip to main content

Jurors and accused child molester hear 7-year-old alleged victim's testimony

By Billie Owens

Geoff Redick of WBTA is the source of this post.

Accused child molester Ronald Smith heard his alleged 7-year-old victim testify against him in Genesee County Court this morning. In a surpising move, Assistant District Attorney Melissa Cianfrini called this primary witness first.

The child, who lives in the City of Batavia, told the jury that "Ronny" is the father of her 1-year-old sister and that the alleged molestation began last fall after he started coming over to the house to visit the baby.

According to the girl, Smith touched her "private parts" on three different occasions when she was left alone with him while her mother visited a neighbor across the street. Each time, she said she told him "to stop it." He told her not to tell anyone or else she'd be grounded.

Before she took the stand, Judge Robert Noonan asked if she knew the difference between a lie and the truth. She said she did and when prompted to explain the difference, she said "If you don't tell the truth, you go to jail."

Smith faces up to seven twenty-one years in prison if convicted at trial on all three sexual abuse counts he faces. The prosecution characterized him as someone who took advantage when the opportunity presented itself and did so purposely for his own sexual gratification.

Cianfrini told the jurors that they would hear Smith's previously recorded testimony, saying that he and the victim were alone at times between October 2010 and January and that he touched her inappropriately.

But Assistant Public Defender William Harper maintained that the defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty and that nothing has been proven in this case.

“If the people cannot dispel reasonable doubt, then they have failed in their burden, and you must find him not guilty," Harper said.

The alledged victim seemed confused when Public Defender Gary Horton asked on cross-examination if she was touched on her clothes or on her bare skin. She said that neither she nor Smith took her clothes off. Cianfrini brought up the point later, and the child revealed that Smith had “reached” inside her clothes.

"Are you nervous to be here today?” Cianfrini asked.

“Yes,” the girl replied.

"Is it difficult for you to answer these questions in front of the court?” Cianfrini asked.

Once again, she replied quietly, “Yes.”

The neighbor across the street was the only other witness called this morning. Her testimony confirmed that the girl’s mother had come over several times between October 2010 and January, leaving the 7-year-old alone at home with Smith.

In court today, Smith wore a white button-down and dress slacks. He paid close attention to the proceedings and took notes.

Proceedings are expected to wrap up late this afternoon, with summations and jury deliberation tomorrow.

CLARIFICATION:

Smith faces up to 7 years imprisonment on each charge of Sexual Abuse 1st. He faces three of those charges. Thus, he faces a maximum of 21 years in prison IF found guilty on all three counts.

My original information was remiss in not making that clear.

--Geoff Redick, WBTA News

Liz Fuchs

Wait a sec, he was out less than 4 months.. did the mother of this monster's child get pregnant while he was locked up? and who in their right fricken mind leaves a child alone with a convicted child molester?

Sep 20, 2011, 4:37pm Permalink
Bob Rathenburgh

Not only who leaves a child alone with an accused child molester - but who in thier right mind goes and has a CHILD with one? I feel so bad for the child this happened to, then i feel bad for the child who has this creep for a father and molested thier step-sibling.. just plain disgusting. Nothing like taking a child's innocents away.

Sep 20, 2011, 5:16pm Permalink

I have a huge problem with the fact that he faces only up to seven years. He has done it before, he will do it again. That poor seven year old has been given a sentence of a lot longer than seven years for having done nothing wrong. If he is found guilty, there should be stiffer penalties for this crime, and all crimes that prey on the most defenseless of citizen. Especially when they are crimes that have the highest recidivism rates, such as child molestation. I don't know what the answer is, but I know that it is not seven years in prison, maybe fifteen to twenty with no chance of parole. Don't get me started on parole and sex offenders, and how so many of them end up living around here.

Sep 20, 2011, 5:20pm Permalink
Gary Spencer

John,
I agree with you 100%, the laws need to be changed so that people like this guy (presumed innocent until proven guilty - although he was already convicted once) would be sentenced to MUCH longer sentences than they currently face. & years for 1st dgree sexual abuse, of a 7 year old child, that is nothing short of ABSURD! The citizens of NY State need to contact our legislators and DEMAND this be changed!

Sep 20, 2011, 10:05pm Permalink
WBTA News

John/Gary--

A clarification: Smith faces up to 7 years imprisonment on each charge of Sexual Abuse 1st. He faces three of those charges.

Thus, he faces a maximum of 21 years in prison IF found guilty on all three counts.

My original information was remiss in not making that clear.

--Geoff Redick, WBTA News

Sep 21, 2011, 12:35am Permalink
Gary Spencer

Geoff,
That may be true, but all to often judges gives concurent sentances for multiple convictions.
We'll see - IF he is found guilty.
I still wonder why the mother couldn't be charged, leaving a child with a convicted sex offender?
Gary

Sep 21, 2011, 9:14am Permalink

Geoff,
Thanks for the clarification. However, If you look at Judge Noonan's history, even if he is convicted on all three counts, the Judge will not give anywhere near the max. I have been disappointed again and again by his light sentences to child molesters and rapists for years. I can even recall sex offenders getting probation from him.

Sep 21, 2011, 11:29pm Permalink

Authentically Local