Skip to main content

A simple request for the City of Batavia: Answer questions

By Howard B. Owens

The first hint of  trouble came in early May, when The Batavian was but a sprout on the Genesee County media landscape.

After initially welcoming The Batavian enthusiastically, we found out that Batavia City Manager Jason Molino told city employees not to cooperate with The Batavian. We could not even get copies of City Council agendas.

We eventually overcame that specific disability, but we've had an ongoing problem with getting answers from Mr. Molino to basic questions related to city governance, and a general lack of full disclosure form the city and its staff when we've sought it.

Two weeks ago, we took our case to the Batavia City Council. The response was, shall we say, tepid.

And we're disappointed.

Here's our position: The Batavian is a legitimate news organization. We may be web-only; our approach to news may be non-traditional; we may be new to the community, but the First Amendment doesn't address any of those issues. It merely enjoins government agencies to respect press freedom.

To us, that means not merely the right to publish as we see fit, but to have free and unfettered access to the government taxpayers support.

For the past several months, we've found that while the city manager will willingly speak with the Daily News and WBTA, he has completely cut out The Batavian as a channel for information to the citizenry on his positions, policies and actions.

He also maintains an inexplicable and unusually tight reign on the tongues of other city staff members.

At first, we hoped for improvement, but with none forthcoming, we began documenting Mr. Molino's failure to respond to interview requests. We documented 13 such instances, including instances where he would later be quoted in other media on the same topic, as well as an instance where Mr. Molino had the new fire chief cancel a video interview with The Batavian.

We've kept quiet about this issue because we were hoping for a friendly resolution to the disagreement over fair access, but since the council meeting two weeks ago, we've been trying to get a lunch appointment with Mr. Molino (The Batavian will pay:  Larry's Steakhouse, any afternoon on 24 hours notice). Mr. Molino has declined the invitation.

Given his lack of willingness to fairly discuss this issue, we've decided it is time to offer readers of The Batavian full disclosure about what has been going on.

As a matter of fairness to readers of The Batavian, we believe we are obligated to keep them informed on any issue that inhibits us from fully and faithfully gathering and disseminating information of public interest. While we regret withholding information about this lack of access until now, we hope readers will understand we did so only because we were seeking to settle this issue amicably long ago, and have persisted in this effort in good faith.

The readers of The Batavian have the same rights as the subscribers of the Daily News and the listeners of WBTA to have a representative of this news organization call upon city officials, ask questions and get answers.  It's a fundamental right under the U.S. Constitution.

Clearly, not all city officials agree.

When we first launched The Batavian, we were happy to find in Mr. Molino a welcoming attitude to the expansion of Batavia's media choices. Unfortunately, only days later, he clammed up. In fact, he told all city employees not to cooperate with us in any manner, including denying us access to routine government documents, such as City Council agendas.

Upon further investigation, we learned that City Attorney George Van Nest had told city officials that The Batavian was not "official media" therefore not entitled to any communication from the city.

That was a curious statement for an attorney to make, so I called Mr. Van Nest and confirmed that he did indeed make that statement. I reminded him that under the First Amendment, there is no such thing as "official press."  After much discussion, he agreed to allow the city to release routine government documents to us and promised full and fair access.

We have not gotten it.

After our presentation to the Council two weeks ago, only one council member spoke to the topic of our speech.  The lack of interest by the Council may, frankly, have owed to the degree to which we placed the burden for lack of access on Mr. Molino.  We've since heard that some council members objected to that tone of the presentation, even those who had encouraged us to make a public plea for greater access, not just for The Batavian, but all of the local media (Mr. Molino does not allow any city staff to speak to any media).

The lone council member to speak on the topic was Bill Cox. He made the clearly contradicted statement -- he had in front of him contrary evidence at the time -- that The Batavian was receiving the same access as any other media outlet.

Since we've reached what seems to be an insurmountable impasse, we think it's only fair we bring this subject to the attention of our readers.

We're not looking for a fight.  We could, if we wanted, start posting Jason's phone number and e-mail address every time we had a question and ask readers to get the information needed; or, we could openly encourage city employees to give us anonymous tips on city business; or we could file a lawsuit. 

The first two options would only serve to cause further hard feelings, and a lawsuit, costing taxpayers money, would subvert our goal to do what is best for Batavia.

So we are left with but a third option: To just drop the issue.

We're doing quite well without the city manager's cooperation, and we imagine we will continue to do quite well whether Mr. Molino favors us with a word or two from time to time or not.

We're not here to be the "official" news source of Batavia. We're quite happy to let the Daily News carry the mantle of "paper of record."  We just think it would be nice to get questions answered when we are curious about an issue or event. If Mr. Molino is unwilling to do that, we think in the long run he is causing more harm to the city than he is to The Batavian. If we're right about that, our best course may be just to let well enough alone and trust that eventually, Mr. Molino or his successor, probably many years from now, will find it counter productive to give any media the silent treatment.

I've uploaded two related documents to our position -- a PDF of court cases that support our position, and a letter from the New York Newspaper Publishers' Association specifically encouraging the city to cooperate with The Batavian.

Kelly Hansen

While perusing the responsibilities listed for the City Manager's Office on Mr. Molino's webpage, a couple items listed stand out:

<b>*Be sensitive and responsive to the rights and needs of the public

*Provide for the free exchange of ideas to allow for effective communication, not only with the public, but between the various City departments and bureaus</b>

I look forward to hearing from Mr. Molino and learning more about how he is going to see that the responsibilities of his office are fulfilled in the future.

Nov 10, 2008, 10:52pm Permalink
John Roach

As for the refusal to answer questions, you’re right to a point. Most of us do not consider this site a “news” organization; we consider it a blog site. I know that legally it is a news site, but the image we all have is different.

Jason is right not letting city employees speak with you or the other news media. He is dead right on that. There can be only one spokesman for an organization and all public agencies have that policy. In fact, most private companies have the same policy: one spokesman. Even Council members have to go through him for information. We saw with Councilman Bialkowski the abuse that can take place when that policy is violated.

There is no requirement Jason have lunch with, why would he want to? But if he gives an interview on a subject to the Daily News or WBTA, you should get one also. Jason has the right to limit the subject of the interview if he does so for the others.

Next, you can file a complaint against him with the New York Secretary of State. This was done at least twice in the 1980’s when Council violated the Open Meeting Law and Council lost.

Last, if the Sec. of State agrees with you and Jason continues to deny you access, then you can ask City Council to replace (fire) him.

You can use this site to keep the issue before the public

Nov 11, 2008, 7:40am Permalink
Howard B. Owens

John, good points.

We could go round-and-round about the "news organization," but that's probably more parsing than is useful.

I've covered at least a half dozen cities in my journalism career. Only one had an "official spokesman," and in that case it was a PR person, but then I could still speak to other city staff. No other city I ever covered prevented me from speaking with city staff, nor staff from speaking to me.

I've known many businesses and organizations -- including the one I work for now -- that allows people to speak to the media on their areas of expertise.

And, fwiw, I'm not saying Jason is in anyway obligated to go to lunch with me. The point was, I wanted to see if we could meet informally and talk this issue through.

Unless something happens to convince us this is a more critical issue than we now believe, I don't see us taking any formal action. We'll just do our best to keep readers informed.

Nov 11, 2008, 7:53am Permalink
Philip Anselmo

"Jason is right not letting city employees speak with you or the other news media. He is dead right on that. There can be only one spokesman for an organization and all public agencies have that policy."

This just isn't true. I have never once had a problem talking with any department head in every other municipality that I've covered for a hometown newspaper. In Canandaigua, for example, I had a great relationship with the city manager, as well as the code inspector, the director of public works, the planning director, the clerk, the assessor... I'm sure you see where this is going. No one ever turned me down or didn't return a call. All of their phone numbers were published on the Web site, as well as distributed in the county phone book. The same goes for municipalities in Genesee County.

There's a difference between being a spokesperson and obstructing the free flow of information. If I have a quick question about why a public works crew is out in force on some city street, I should have no problem telephoning that director and getting a quick answer. There's no reason it shouldn't be that simple.

A city is not the same as a private company. Companies are run on behalf of their stockholders. Cities are run by and for the people of the city.

Nov 11, 2008, 7:59am Permalink
John Roach

I beleive you should file a formal complaint and get this cleared up. If it was not important to your orgainization, it would not have been brought up. In addition, the public would be well served.

It would not cost anything. Councilwoman Christan has gone to the Sec. of State a number of times.

Nov 11, 2008, 8:21pm Permalink
Gabor Deutsch

The Batavian has and is doing legitamit news reporting that the daily news did biased like in print without allowing people to post. How threatened is the inky and more swayed by the city council feedings then the batavian ? BIG announcement that they are going to have their own website. HMMMMmm, city council, stories, statements. POOPY COCKY. Everyday the batavian gets to the members and gives the news, FOR FREE. I dont always agree with everyone I post stomp go away and piss people off but dont ever say this website is not OFFICIAL. I beg to differ maybe the other 600 plus members might agree.
Gabor D Deutsch

Dec 3, 2008, 10:54pm Permalink

Authentically Local