Skip to main content

The server change

By Howard B. Owens

On Friday night we started the migration to a new host server for The Batavian. We thought it would be a one-night job.

Our new IT support guy -- Nick, of Batavia -- put the site in "read only mode" and began transferring the database to the new server.

But we've published so much content over the past two and a half years years that the transfer ended up stretching well into Saturday.

Around 7 a.m., today, everything seemed set to flip the switch on the domain name and start pointing traffic to the new location.

Then we had some technical bug.

Things have seemed to settle down, but it will take a couple of days to get everything back to normal. Primarily, search isn't working yet and in posts pictures may not be appearing yet.

If you're seeing this post, you are seeing the new server. Everything should be fine.

There's no effective way to communicate this to people not seeing this post, but I'll put it out there anyway. If you're not seeing the new site, try restarting your computer. If that doesn't work, your Internet Service Provider just hasn't caught up with the change yet.  That can take some service providers as much as 48 hours to catch up.

Why the move: We anticipate a performance improvement. I feel like I'm already seeing it, though the server is still working pretty hard indexing the database and such. 

The simplest way to explain why we anticipate an improvement: When you have a site on a server that shares the server with other Web sites (a common type of commercial hosting environment), there is software that acts like a traffic cop and says, "OK, it's your turn to get this site, now it's your turn to go here, and now it's your turn to get this one."

This should happen very fast but, after we hired Nick to take over IT duties, he discovered that the type of software our previous host used had been shown to perform about four times slower than other options, so we decided in order to improve performance, we should change hosts.

Like I said, I feel like I'm already seeing better initial load times, so here's to hoping all of the frustration of the past 24 hours or so have been worth the change for all of us.

Bernie Thompson

Howard;
Waiting a few days for the new server to fully kick in is understandable.I'm just hoping that everything works out.Right now things are not as they were? As they say,sometimes change is not always ones best alternative?Than again it is also said in the business world "Change before you are forced to"Guess it's the "Wait and see mode now" Good Luck and Best Wishes.

Jan 30, 2011, 2:04pm Permalink
Howard B. Owens

Gabor, there are only 12 photos slotted into the home page right now, and 11 of them are loading just fine. Also, the amount of bandwidth pics take are not significant.

The main problem with the previous host was just that initial load, that initial request for the page from the server ... most of the time, once the page started loading, I always found it surprisingly quick for as big as it is.

I hoping we've solved that initial load problem.

Jan 30, 2011, 2:10pm Permalink
C. M. Barons

Aside from today's random occasions of 'read only,' stalled loads, 'comments active' and drupal errors; the site seems to be functioning well as of 11:09 Sunday night. I don't notice any significant load-time improvement, but I have a DSL connection downloading at 880 kbps (110 KB/sec transfer rate).

Jan 30, 2011, 11:25pm Permalink
Peter O'Brien

Howard,
Do you have an RSS feed? I am setting up my google reader account and would like to include the front page articles from The Batavian.

Feb 14, 2011, 8:20am Permalink

Authentically Local