Skip to main content

Today's Poll: Do you support Obama's troop build up in Afghanistan?

By Howard B. Owens
Peter O'Brien

Rush put is perfectly,

If the Taliban said "We are going to train 30,000 new terrorists and in two years we are going to go back to Pakistan" what would you think. Me I'd think we won.

You can't tell your enemies that you are going to quit and expect anything but to embolden them.

Obama is a coward of the first order.

Dec 3, 2009, 11:50am Permalink
Chris Charvella

The heck are you talking about Peter? He's sending 17,000 more troops into Afghanistan. I don't think he's a coward, I think he's an idiot; at least on this issue.

At least he's an idiot with an exit strategy.

Dec 3, 2009, 12:16pm Permalink
Dave Olsen

I agree with Chris, Obama is an idiot, this may well end his chance for re-election. Also, Rush Limbaugh is an ass. A very rich and famous ass, but still............. Not to mention what branch of the military did he serve with? Same one as Obama.

Dec 3, 2009, 12:38pm Permalink
Thomas Mooney

Why would anyone put a time frame on pulling out of a war before we know how long it will take to train the Afgans.I don't see how we can effectivly train the afgans in such a short time frame . The pull out for july 2011 is unrealistic and everyone who is connected to the military knows this . Don't count on the pull out happening in 2011 , more like 2013 , that is if we want to accomplish what we went there for .

Dec 3, 2009, 12:43pm Permalink
Jim Burns

I am no fan of war. I was very against us invading Iraq, especially before we had finished wiping the terrorists off the planet that we were fighting in Afghanistan.

I am for us sending more troops to Afghanistan to stabilize the area and see if we can get all the terrorists or at least those that harbored terrorists.

I think the withdrawal date is nothing more than political pandering to the base or wishful and possibly naive thinking. I would prefer that it be political pandering and that out President is smarter than that. I also prefer this type of pandering to bad “Top Gun” publicity stunts with an embarrassingly miss fitted flight suit and banners that proclaim “Mission Accomplished”

These are just my personal opinions. These opinions have not been influenced by an overweight drug addict ;)

Dec 3, 2009, 12:45pm Permalink
jonathan bell

30000 more troops to afghanista yes. announcing a withdrawl date retarded. The taliban isnt dumb they heard that and attacks will slow down and theyre just going to wait for us to pull out and then take over the government again. Thes taliban leaders were trained by americans they've been fighting since before we were a country the beat a world super power not because of skill or because of anything other then this is there land. hills, cliffs and mountains that are near impossible to navigate. caves we dont know exist and the american public complaining about civilian casualties. Yes civilian casualties are said and are avoided at all costs but when a soldier is shot at from inside a crowd or a building we cant shoot back because of civilians? WWI and WWII had more civilian casualties then military why? cause when a villiage was considered "hostile" they went in full force and took it over. now congress is trying to run the war and says we cant do that anymore we have to be nice. THIS IS WAR not story time at the richmond library. Ive seen to many of my friends killed or injured because of a very preventable incident.

Dec 3, 2009, 1:23pm Permalink
Chris Charvella

Eight years is already too long. We went there to capture or kill Osama bin Laden. We failed (mainly because he lives in Pakistan.) Time to leave folks.

Dec 3, 2009, 1:25pm Permalink
jonathan bell

its not time to leave and yes you have the right to say that but you shouldn't. Your not here you dont see whats happening and the good were doing for this country. i can show you 1000s of pictures of the good things that have happened over here. What you all fail to realize is this isnt the US's war. Bush did this one right, he got the UN involved. There are 38 countries represented over here. There are canadians polish chechs spanish swedish hell eve the french have alot of troops over here so before you go off like you kow what your talking about do research chris maybe thats why you lost the election your misinformed

Dec 3, 2009, 1:44pm Permalink
Chris Charvella

Hey John, I was there, at the beginning and a few times throughout, with various units. You're not more informed on this issue than I am, but I will respect your right to your opinion.

P.S. Stay as safe as you reasonably can. I'll buy you a beer next time you're home.

Dec 3, 2009, 2:22pm Permalink
jonathan bell

im not more informed then you i beg to differ. as a cival affairs sergent this is what i do. Rebuild afghanistan and correct me if im wrong but you previously said you deployed to IRAQ and even that I question cause when you were my parents neighbor you mentioned you were thinking of joinig you not that you were a vet. ill do the correct thing and pull your dd214 though and see if your telling the truth. Even if you were that was how may years ago? i was stationed at Salerno in july 07 and this deployment alone i can see the change

Dec 3, 2009, 2:03pm Permalink
Chris Charvella

John, I've always said I served in 'the desert.' I don't discuss the specifics of deployments. I know who you are now...we used to play basketball in the driveway when you were a kid.

That beer is still waiting for you when you get home.

Dec 3, 2009, 2:09pm Permalink
Thomas Mooney

So John , I am sure the Government is paying you right now to comment on something that is irrelevant. Pull the dd214 that should make you proud of yourself . What you should be ,is ashamed of yourself , take a look in the mirror and ask yourself the question , are you helping yourself more than you are helping others .

Dec 3, 2009, 2:42pm Permalink
Chris Charvella

Thomas, John has absolutely nothing to be ashamed of. He does more with an hour of his day to make this world a better place than you will in your entire life.

I won't allow you to personally attack a soldier currently serving in a war zone. John doesn't need to and shouldn't have to defend himself here against the likes of you.

Dec 3, 2009, 2:50pm Permalink
Dave Olsen

Well, Jonathan my respect for what you do not withstanding, exactly what right do you think you have to access another's DD-214? That is personal information.

Dec 3, 2009, 2:55pm Permalink
Thomas Mooney

Chris you have no idea what I do , nor will I ever brag about what I do . How did I pesonally attack him ? Everyone has something to be ashamed of , don't you or are you perfect .The simple fact that he called me an idiot for having an opinion is reason for him to be ashamed . Or do you raise your children to a different standard.Thats right you are basking in your Grandfather's success .There was no draft so John choose to do what he does , and he gets paid for it . Killing people in every aspect is wrong , so how does that make the world better . Keep believing what the government tells you why we should be there . Nothing that is done over there(afgan.) will ever effect me unless I have an idiot relative that decides to make a living to fight a holy war .

Dec 3, 2009, 3:02pm Permalink
Chris Charvella

Never attack the soldier for doing his job. Attack policy all you want, but remember that members of the military will gladly die for your right to engage in those attacks.

I don't like the way the war in Afghanistan is going and I never thought we should be in Iraq, but folks like John aren't the problem. He is here defending his honor and his integrity which I'm sure he has in spades. He believes strongly in what he is doing and he should be proud of the effort he puts into making Afghanistan a better place.

He and I disagree on policy, but his deeds are not subject to question as far as I am concerned.

Dec 3, 2009, 3:19pm Permalink
Jerry Buckman

Howard, I often have trouble with the qualifiers you put on your poll choices because they tend to leave out other possible answers. For example, one answer to this poll is "No. We should just get out." There are many other possibilities, like "No. We need 100,000 more troops." or "No. I lack confidence in Pres Obama." or "No. Gen McCrystal's plan is better." or ...just plain "No. Answer in comments below."

This probably seems over critical of your efforts, but I couldn't vote in this poll (and others) because none of the choices fit. I hope you're not offended.

Jerry

Dec 3, 2009, 7:39pm Permalink
doug smith

Thomas Mooney
i wonder if you feel the same about the boys in ww1 ww2
was it wrong to kill the germans, japanese,....i say kill
them before they kill us....hope your childern and grandchildren never have to deal with another 9/11....
AS far as a pull out date....who cares.....if need be we expand the deadline......

Dec 3, 2009, 8:18pm Permalink
Howard B. Owens

Jerry, I can't possibly account for all the possible choices. These are none scientific polls, you might say for entertainment purposes. I think they provide some sense of what way readers of The Batavian lean or particular issues, but they're not scientific. The best thing I can say is pick whichever choice most closely matches your view point. Or don't vote is a valid option.

Dec 3, 2009, 8:50pm Permalink
DOUGLAS MCCLURG

Wow-read It all and voted In favor of the presidents decision
"I don't see how we can effectively train the Afghans in such a short time frame" .
This quote from above disturbs me.
My boy goes to basic training for 4 months last winter spring and came home a war machine.He has been certified by my country to be ready to fight for the freedoms of America.
Now why can't we train these Afghan youth the same way to defend their government.If they really want our help,they could make It mandatory for all youths 18-21 to enlist to some form of military service-Now that would be showing The UN coalition that they are serious.
In conclusion "America or an American Is not The government-It's the people that live here" !!

Dec 3, 2009, 9:13pm Permalink
John Roach

Doug,
You can train a solider much faster than you can train an Army.

But, we have been training them for years, and the ones trained do well as soldiers, but not as an Army.

It will be hard to train a "Afghan National Army" when there is no such thing as a Nation. Most do not see themselves as "Afghan", but as members of the local clan, village and district. It is a bunch of different ethnic people who have no national identity. It will take more than Obama's 18 months.

Dec 4, 2009, 6:01am Permalink
DOUGLAS MCCLURG

John,
I as well as most American would just like to see the occupation of foreign countries end.I don't have the answers and hope the current administration Is on the right track to bring them all home by the end of his term.

Dec 4, 2009, 6:23am Permalink
Jeff Allen

Maybe this is why it took 3 months to come to a decision...

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/l4vlBgh7KLg&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/l4vlBgh7KLg&hl=en_US&fs=1&&quot; type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

Dec 4, 2009, 9:04am Permalink
jonathan bell

so Thomas killing is wrong in every aspect?i guy breaks into your house and threatens your family your not gonna step in and defend them and kill if necessary? i am married with 2 children ad i am proud of what i do and accomplish every day i dont brag about what i do and 90% of what i do noone knows about because US soldiers are humble we dont do it for awards or praise cause at the ed of your life a piece of tin on a mans chest means nothing.

Dec 4, 2009, 12:09pm Permalink
jonathan bell

douglas you say you want to see the "occupation" of foreign countries ended? what foreign countries does the United States occupy? afghanistan? no this is a war zone the afghan goverment wants us here. Iraq? no the iraqi's asked us to leave and we are, not because of the current president the pull out was in the works long before he was ever elected alls he did was speed it up and cost the tax payers alot of money due to us having to leave equipment there. Every single person serving in today military volunteered to go to war. they joined or reuped after the war was already started and like myself many of them would rather face death then have their wives or children see what war is like. since the dawn of time armies were created to LEAVE there homes and face enemies not sit back and wait to get attacked and again i cant stress this enough. THIS IS NOT THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA OVER HERE THIS IS THE UNITED NATIONS, THEY APPROVED IT THEY RUN IT THIS IS THEIR WAR. you saying we shouldnt be helping the afghan people would be like our fore fathers bashing the french for helping us gain our independance.

Dec 4, 2009, 12:18pm Permalink
jonathan bell

doug your son may have come home a "war machine" but basic training is a joke. i didnt get hardly any knowledge at all in basic training, it was just that BASIC. real training comes from key leaders and you say initiate a draft? iraqis were forced to serve and how long did it take the US to roll into Baghdad? a draft is a horrible idea a volunteer army agrees to fight from the begining draftees dont care theyre forced into it. and theres a difference between training an afghani to fight and an american soldier. when i joined i didnt put my family at risk to be killed because of my choice. these afghans not only put their lives on the line for the country but theyre agreeing to put their families lives on the line for it. do you think you could fight the taliban better if your family was in jeapordy or would you run away when they said run? id run personally my family comes first. my son is almost 2 years old and ive spent a total of 4 months with him and i volonteered to redeploy cause i believe in whats happening over here. if you stop watching the news for a little bit ad ask the people over here youll understand

Dec 4, 2009, 12:28pm Permalink
jonathan bell

since 2001 1534 total people have given their lives in support of the war in afghanistan 931 by the end of FY09. in 2009 alone the United States Army had 1124 deaths in the states from car accidents trainig accidents etc. just a little reminder that your in more danger driving to north side deli or sportos then i am when i gear up for patrol

go army beat navy

Dec 4, 2009, 12:34pm Permalink
bud prevost

Jonathan- Thank God for the internet. This has allowed you to stay in contact with your hometown, and express the pride you show in helping protect our nation. For this, I thank you and your fellow soldiers.
While I applaud the troops, I am of the mind that we should bring all American troops home, protect our borders, and rebuild the infrastructure of OUR great nation.
Germany, Japan, South Korea, we have hundreds of 1000's of men and women deployed in 187 countries. And many,many more civilians working for the government as well. While many may call this isolationist or protectivist thinking, I call it survival.
Jonathan, how many of the UN troops are from the US versus the rest of the world? Do you truly believe this is not the United States' war? Again, don't get me wrong, I admire your patriotism and desire to serve. I just wish you folks were all stateside, and let the rest of the world take care of itself.
I hope you are safe, young man, and I look forward to your return home. I promise you I will go out of my way to meet you out for a couple of beers, because that gives us something to look forward to. I would also like to extend an invitation to any Batavians who care to join us. You name the time and the place kid, and I'm sure a couple of people will show up. :) mmm beer

Good luck and God bless. And God bless the USA and all it's troops home and away.

Dec 4, 2009, 1:06pm Permalink
jonathan bell

yes we have troops in germany korean south africa kuwait japan and kosovo but the government looks out for those troops and i love germany my wife is from germany and japan i would love to go to japan on uncle sams dollar these are all key places to have people. 173rd airborne division in italy can be anywhere in the world in 8 hours. that means if some radical fool in Uzbekistan starts another ethnic war the US can have 1200 troops in that theater basically right away. then you have the 82nd in north carloina it would take then 17 hours to get to the same AO. so i ask you. if we had bases in europe and asia would WWI and WWII have had the same results today?

Dec 4, 2009, 1:29pm Permalink
Howard B. Owens

Bud wrote: "Germany, Japan, South Korea, we have hundreds of 1000's of men and women deployed in 187 countries. And many,many more civilians working for the government as well. While many may call this isolationist or protectivist thinking, I call it survival."

Bravo.

And I'll add, at a cost of $6 billion per year.

Dec 4, 2009, 2:08pm Permalink
bud prevost

As I said, I commend the job you are doing. But it is not our place to police the world, or inflict our way of life on the whole world. If you want to be a policeman, guard the southern or northern borders of the US. Thanks for protecting my right to speak my opinion.

Dec 4, 2009, 2:13pm Permalink

Authentically Local