Skip to main content

Hawley expresses his unhappiness with proposed budget

By Howard B. Owens

We just received the following statement from Assemblyman Steve Hawley. 

I did not know until I read it here that the proposed budget shifts money from local governments to the state, which as Hawley points out, is going to only mean increased local taxes (or severe cuts in services).

I've tried to keep my comments on the budget as non-partisan as possible.  The shipwreck of a budget could have just as easily been produced by a GOP-controlled Albany -- maybe not the same, but I have no confidence the Republicans could do any better. That said, I think it needs to be said: Local Democrats tend to be pretty active commenters on The Batavian. It's noteworthy, then, that in two days of raising the budget issue on The Batavian, none of the usual Democratic stalwarts have stepped forward to defend Paterson, Smith and Silver.  Maybe my noting this will bring forth some sort of intelligent defense. I would love to hear it. But I suspect strongly that any common-sense Democrat also recognizes this budget proposal is exceptionally indefensible.

Hawley's statement follows the jump:

Assemblyman Steve Hawley (R,I,C-Batavia) today expressed his displeasure with the 2009-10 State Budget and the secret negotiations used to hammer out a deal.

"The budget was agreed upon in secret closed-door meetings that involved the state's three legislative leaders, Governor Paterson (D - Harlem), Senate Majority Leader Malcolm Smith (D - Queens) and Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver (D - Manhattan/Chinatown) - all downstate New York City Democrats - with no input from other elected representatives.

"The state budget, details of which were hashed out at the last minute under a cloud of secrecy, lacked the transparency and openness that New Yorkers deserve. Albany's dysfunction once again reared its ugly head at a time when the state is in the midst of a recession and is struggling to survive with a $17 billion budget deficit.

"The $132 billion spending plan calls for a ten percent increase, or $10.5 billion in spending, over last year and includes $7 billion in new taxes and fees. In addition, the budget eliminates the critical STAR Rebate program that provides middle-income homeowners with $1.7 billion in relief from skyrocketing property taxes. More taxes and no property tax relief is the last thing that New Yorkers need right now. Raising taxes through "hidden" fees will force more New Yorkers to flee the state in search of less expensive areas and will further erode the state's tax base.  The governor is retaining $1 billion from the federal stimulus program (newly printed money) and I challenge him to use it all to reinstate the STAR Rebate program.

"The budget will also include a 50% reduction in VLT funding that will leave municipalities that depend on this money left holding the bag. The City of Batavia will see a cut of $314,849, the Town of Batavia $114,563, and Genesee County $143,137.  This lack of funding will force municipalities to pass along the added burden to taxpayers.

"The budget spends too much, taxes too much and does nothing to solve the state's fiscal problems. New Yorkers are struggling everyday to pay their bills and put food on the table and placing additional tax burdens on their backs will only further the struggle. New Yorkers deserve better, and for this reason I have voted no on the entire 2009-10 state budget."

tom hunt

There are no new chapters in Profiles in Courage being written in Albany this year. Just the same old spend and tax scenario that the weary taxpayer has seen in recent years.

Apr 1, 2009, 2:55am Permalink
Frank Michaels

Where are Russ Stressing, Dan Jones and Lorie Longhany? Check the milk cartons. They have been oddly silent on this all-democrat budget. I dare them to defend it. The budget is indefensible and hurts regular working people. Democrats should be ashamed of this budget. This is what you get when three New York City Democrats get together in a room. They could care less about us in upstate. Maybe seperating the state is a good idea. Anyone interested in doing a tax tea party rebellion in Batavia? Would the Batavian cover it? Glad we have people like Hawley.

Apr 1, 2009, 3:25pm Permalink
Melissa Marsocci

Well said Frank. I could not agree more. Governor Patterson is absolutely out of control, and needs to be stopped. I truly think this man has lost his mind, because nowhere listed in his budget, is a rational idea to fix the economic situation of the state. Rather, it is going to force all of us to move to some other state that is affordable.

Apr 1, 2009, 3:49pm Permalink
Richard Gahagan

Look, I think it's already decided. The Dems intent here is to create as many dependant Americans as possible looking to government for handouts, welfare, meaningless government jobs, mortgage payments, health insurance, their hope and salvation. This is the end of America and New York as we have known it, because that's then going to set the stage for everything being government owned, operated, or provided. I don't believe in that. I know that's not how this country is going to be great in the future; it's not what made this country great. I will keep my guns, my money, my liberty, and my freedom they can keep the "change" and they can all go to hell I'm goin to Texas.

Apr 1, 2009, 5:30pm Permalink

Authentically Local