Skip to main content

Police end standoff with possibly armed suspect peacefully

By Howard B. Owens

jacksonmay102015.jpg

Ferguson. Los Angeles. Chicago. Cleveland. Brooklyn. Baltimore. The national media has reported several examples of aggressive police conduct in these cities in the past few months that ended in violence.

In those same months. Batavia PD has dealt with at least three incidents, including one today, that easily could have gotten bloody but ended quietly.

Chief Shawn Heubusch said it's by design.

"Our number-one goal is to resolve every situation we run into as peacefully as possible," Heubusch said. "We want to use as little force as possible."

Today's incident began with a report of a man at 102 Jackson threatening to shoot children in the head for causing a ruckus near his residence.

Police weren't certain he had a gun, but it was a distinct possibility, so they proceeded with caution -- calling in extra back-up, eventually deploying the Emergency Response Team and even positioning two State Police sharpshooters on the roof of the Salvation Army with a clear line of sight into the man's second-floor window.

They also interrupted the relaxing Mother's Day that Officer James DeFreze was enjoying with his family.

Defreze is a trained negotiator. ERT members tossed a special, wired phone into the man's apartment. DeFreze and the man talked.

"The broad procedure we try to follow is to build rapport and be empathetic and try to understand what people are going through," DeFreze said. "We try to get them to open up and then see what we can do to help them. They're really just looking for help."

The negotiation took 30 to 45 minutes, Defreze said. The entire time, police officers, troopers and deputies remained in positions with long guns trained at the suspect's second-story window.

In the end, no shots were fired. The man walked out of his apartment and surrendered to a police officer.

Officer Marc Lawrence said the investigation is ongoing, but charges likely against the suspect, whose name has not yet been released.

There were high fives among a couple of the officers, pats on the back for DeFreze and a crowded gathered at Central and Jackson applauded the effort by police to resolve the potentially deadly situation peacefully.

"I did hear them applauding," DeFreze said. "It was nice. At first it seemed like they weren't paying attention, having a little bit of fun over there, but it was nice that they appreciated us and our work in the end."

About a month ago, DeFreze and a deputy who is also trained in negotiation helped talk a woman into surrendering and in March, a knife-wielding man on Central Avenue came at officers and threatened them, but the officers involved were able to defuse the situation and take the man into custody without incident.

"Our number-one goal is to make sure everybody goes home safe, the suspect included," Heubusch said.

Some passersby yelled out suggestions for police, of the type that veered toward a more violent, quick-resolution response.  

"Let me have a gun," one man said. "I'll end this."

Others wanted to see tear gas lobbed into the building and ERT members swarm the apartment.

Unless it's a hostage situation, the best response is a slow, methodical approach, Heubusch said.  The suspect isn't going anywhere, is a minimal threat and can probably be talked out of any drastic actions.

"We would rather take the time to ensure that everybody involved is safe and avoid anything that could cause harm to anybody, including the suspect himself," Heubusch said. "There's nothing wrong with slowing it down."

Heubusch said a good rapport with the community helps officers take their time to resolve conflicts.

He said he can't speak for what goes on in other communities. Of course, he and his officers pay attention to news accounts of violent confrontations involving other police officers, but since he isn't involved and doesn't have all the facts, he doesn't want to compare what happens in Batavia with what happens elsewhere.

"We're constantly evaluating and constantly changing tactics as needed," Heubusch said. "Back in the '80s or '90s, for example, if the SWAT Team showed up for a call out, guess what, they were going in the door. We have new techniques now. If there's no danger, we've learned it's better to sit and wait."

Today's incident lasted more than four hours, but in the end, the patience of trained and skilled police officers proved the perfect response.

jacksonmay102015-2.jpg

Officer James DeFreze on the right.

jacksonmay102015-3.jpg

jacksonmay102015-4.jpg

jacksonmay102015-5.jpg

jacksonmay102015-6.jpg
'

jacksonmay102015-7.jpg

jacksonmay102015-8.jpg

jacksonmay102015-9.jpg

Raymond Richardson

"Some passersby yelled out suggestions for police, of the type that veered toward a more violent, quick-resolution response.

"Let me have a gun," one man said. "I'll end this."

Other's wanted to see tear gas lobbed into the building and ERT members swarm the apartment."

It's unfortunate that there are some members of society that watch too much t.v. and think that's how it's done in reality.

News flash for them: Real life situations are not looking for higher ratings.

May 11, 2015, 8:17am Permalink
John Roach

Thomas, how did you know there was no weapon? The police did not know, so how did you?
Or is this a case of perfect 20-20 hindsight?

May 12, 2015, 7:14am Permalink
Thomas Mooney

20 to 30 officers. insurgents take over complete cities with that many . 6 seals captured Osama. we pay for everyone of those guys . same job with half the guys, same result . government redundancy at its best

May 12, 2015, 5:07pm Permalink
Cory Hawley

Still doesn't explain your first comment of "little over the top considering no weapon." Of course you can say that NOW. What about when the call was made that he threatened to shoot kids and the guy was hiding out inside and refused to come out? I have kids and if some guy threatened to kill them with a gun and you can't distinguish if he has one or not then oh well... To Serve & Protect was thoroughly conducted by law enforcement, whether it was to your liking or not. If the guy had acted on his threat and there was little officer presence, then what would you say?. If I had a problem with anything it'd be the crowd control issue. If you have a crazy guy threatening to shoot kids, then a crowd gawking is the last thing you need to talk this guy down. It was Mother's Day! What are you doing standing watching this for?

May 12, 2015, 10:59pm Permalink

Authentically Local