Skip to main content

Today's Poll: Should the public financing option for building sports stadiums be eliminated?

By Howard B. Owens
Doug Yeomans

Amen, Dave. I'm tired of hearing about our taxes supporting things such as pro sports, which with all their fans, endorsements, and branding, should be able to support themselves. Also, take away their tax free status. Lets fix the roads and bridges before fixing stadiums and subsidizing the wealthy.

Mar 9, 2015, 11:12am Permalink
Brian Graz

I'd go even further and eliminate the taxpayer from paying for extra-curricular activities in the public schools. Let the family's of the kids who participate [which is a minority of the total student population], fund those programs.

Mar 9, 2015, 3:57pm Permalink
Peter O'Brien

Mark,
It can be argued that the ice arena is just an indoor park. The cost for a regular member of the community is a just an upkeep fee to pay for the utility costs that a sandlot ball field doesn't incur. Unlike Dwyer, I can go and play hockey or just skate at Falleti.

Brian and Alvin,
If football players had to pay for their own pads like the other contact sports, that would be a substantial savings in itself. Hockey players don't get shoulder and shin pads from the school, do they even get helmets and gloves provided? What about lacrosse? Its not about excluding the poor, it about reducing costs to families so they can pay for things a bit more important than a jock's best days in high school.

Mar 9, 2015, 10:44pm Permalink

Authentically Local