Skip to main content

Byron and Bergen residents hash out options for library

By Howard B. Owens

There are at least four options -- and maybe more, listening to the people who attended the public meeting last night at Byron Town Hall -- for the citizens of Byron and Bergen to consider for library space now that the Gillam-Grant Community Center will stop funding support for the library in that facility.

About 40 people attended last night's meeting, and most had something to say about the library situation.

"We have a lot of work to do," Kristin Gordon, financial secretary for the Byron-Bergen Public Library Board, said after the meeting. "It's obvious to me that the consensus of the crowd is to keep both libraries open. The public feedback is important. There were lots of good points made tonight and I assure you none of it will fall on deaf ears.

Certainly, both library locations have their supporters.

The town people seem to favor Gillam-Grant, while the village folk like their easily accessible library location.

"Kids walk to the library every day," Cheryl Wittman, of Bergen, who said she's lived in the area for 29 years. "A lot of the programs they have at night, the summer programs, and lots of parents work so they can't take them there, so they need to walk."

An older woman in the audience said a short time later, “It’s got to stay in the village. It’s got to.”

But many town residents seemed to favor the Gillam-Grant location, arguing that it is more easily accessible to the entire community, not just the village residents.

It is also a newer, slightly large facility.

The village library is about 1,400 square feet and was described by board members as small and in need of expansion.  The Gillam-Grant location is 2,000 square feet and has room for offices and storage space.

The rent for the Gillam-Grant location, however, is $8,000 per month, while the village location is $1,200 per month.

One audience member pointed out that with a combined library, with increased traffic and more books to store, the additional 600 sq. ft. isn't that much more space.

And all of the options for the community are like that -- every option has pros in cons.

In fact, every member of the crowd received a piece of paper that listed the four main options with the pros and cons of each option written out.

The four primary options are:

  • Close the Gillam-Grant location and keep the village location;
  • Close the village location and keep Gillam-Grant
  • Obtain school district/special district library status
  • Keep both locations open, relying on existing town funding or through status change.

None of the options are clear-cut winners.  Besides the financial and space constraints associated with the current locations, an option that involves creating a new special district would take 18 months to two years to complete.

The funding for the Gillam-Grant location -- which pays for building operations and staffing -- is set to expire Dec. 31.

The comunity has a chance to come together again tonight at 7 p.m. to discuss the issue at the Bergen Village Hall.

C. M. Barons

Closing the village Library through consolidation at the Gilliam Grant Center will not create a new opportunity; it will eliminate an existing opportunity. Only Pocock's cows will find the new location convenient. This is a disservice to, notably, children who currently have unfettered access to Library services.

It may sound selfish to insist on retaining the village Library. It is not. The village Library has existed through constant nurturing for generations. Those who live in locations other than the village, chose a residence that precludes services, part and parcel to village settings. The bottom line is this: currently villagers are able to access Library services without driving. Relocating the village Library will neccesitate ALL Library patrons drive to the Library.

The Library at the Center is under-utilized. Distance is a prime determinant in the under-use. It will continue to be a deterent. The youngsters who currently have ready access to Bergen's Library would be deprived of a Library. Walking three miles down route 262 is not an option- there is no other alternative.

Closing Bergen's Library is not progress. Byron needs a Library, and locating one at West Bergen Road does not give Byron a Library. The Center's plan TAKES a Library from Bergen. That is selfish.

Jun 19, 2009, 12:29am Permalink

Authentically Local