Skip to main content

Officials wrapping up investigation into death of Iraq vet on Darien Lake rollercoaster

By Howard B. Owens

State regulators are expected to meet with investigators from the Sheriff's Office tomorrow and present their findings from their investigation into the death Friday of Iraq war hero James Hackemer, who was ejected from the Ride of Steel at Darien Lake Theme Park.

Until then, it's hard to say, according to Deputy Chief Jerome Brewster, if there will be any evidence to take to the District Attorney's Office for possible prosecution of any staff members at the theme park.

"At this point, we don't see any evidence of criminality," Brewster said. "But we'll have to see what the Department of Labor comes up with in their half of the investigation. If in their half, they find training records that show a supervisor or employees were trained not to let an amputee on the ride (for example), then maybe there is something to take to the District Attorney to review."

Brewster said, rather than a criminal complaint the findings might support a possible civil action by Hackemer's family, noting, however, that in any case where there is an injury or death on an amusement park ride, some sort of civil action is likely.

"Just off the top of my head I would think there’s some potential for civil liability, but criminal liability remains to be seen," Brewster said.

The Sheriff's Office has completed its investigation, Brewster said. The DOL investigators were at the scene of the accident today and are expected to return to Darien Lake in the morning before meeting with the Sheriff's Office in the afternoon.

Darien Lake officials are being exceptionally tight lipped about the accident.

Cassandra Okon, spokeswoman for the theme park, today repeated what she's told every news outlet that's called her: Officials at the park have no idea how long the investigation will take and until then park officials have no comment on the accident.

Asked if there would be a press conference after the investigation is completed, Okon said that hasn't been decided.

She took The Batavian's e-mail address and said if there are any further statements from Darien Lake, the statements will be e-mailed to all of the media outlets on her list.

The story of Hackemer's death has been reported throughout the world.

He lost both of his legs to a roadside bomb in Iraq and twice nearly died as a result of his wounds.

Hackemer's family told the Buffalo News that the 29-year-old father of two "died happy."

"I have no doubt in my mind that he died happy," his sister, Jody Hackemer, said Saturday as the family gathered at Hackemer's parents' farmhouse in Gowanda. "I know that's hard to comprehend. But really, he was doing what he wanted to do. And that's the important thing."

While there have been rumors since the accident that Hackemer insisted on getting on the ride over the objections of Darien Lake staff, the family contradicts those account in the Buffalo News article.

"We in no shape or form hold Darien Lake accountable," the sister said. "They weren't negligent. It's nobody's fault. It was an accident. James thought it wasn't an issue."

Brewster said that what he's seen from the investigation reports so far indicate that Hackemer wanted to get on the ride and family and staff assisted him. There was no attempt that Brewster is aware of to stop Hackemer from taking a seat on the Ride of Steel.

"Nobody has indicated that at this point," Brewster said.

Brewster confirmed accounts that Hackemer was ejected from the ride at the crest of a hill on the ride the runs parallel Route 77 where other rides have said the gravitational shift causes riders to lift out of their seats.  

Hackemer had already been though bigger hills in the ride, so it's still not clear why he was ejected at this point in the ride.

The accident has revived an attempt by a Massachusetts congressman to take theme park regulation out of the hands of state officials and put regulation and investigation into federal officials' hands.

The local and state regulators who currently oversee amusement parks may lack the budget resources and technical experience to carry out effective safety checks and investigate accidents, Markey said.

"While the cause of the accident that claimed the life of Sgt. Hackemer is still unknown, one thing is crystal clear: Hypercoasters that hurtle riders at speeds exceeding 70 miles per hour along 200-foot drops should not be exempt from federal safety oversight," Markey said.

He plans to introduce legislation, which he has proposed multiple times before, to make fixed-site amusement parks subject to the regulatory authority of the Consumer Product Safety Commission, a federal consumer protection body. The move could prevent future injuries, he said.

Mardell Lamb

"Hackemer had already been though bigger hills in the ride, so it's still not clear why he was ejected at this point in the ride."

Could it be that perhaps each time he went down the hills & thru the loops his body became increasingly dislodged from the safety belts? Each time = he becomes looser in the belt.

Is it even possible to stop a ride that's going that fast when someone is in jeopardy?

This is clearly so sad. My thoughts and prayer go out to his family.

Jul 11, 2011, 5:51pm Permalink
Rob Wolfley

not for nothing but he should have been smart enough to not even think about going on the ride. everyone involved in this accident, including the victim, is to blame.

Jul 11, 2011, 8:47pm Permalink
Chris March

firstly, to say anyone is 'to blame' is playing judge, jury, and in this case executioner. a horrible accident that was a confluence -of characteristics of the victim and characteristics of the device -that caused injury/death are to blame. the ride is designed to lock you in with your legs.

BUT to say the government should be involved.....welll I am a little sick of the governemnt 'watching over' baseball football, biking, etc. those things affect possibly .05% of our population, much like amusement rides. lets see our governement tackle some things that affect EVERYONE....the budget (getting out of a war we get NOTHING from- except protection of our oil interests), green power initiatives, immigration, the national debt, homelessness...etc

they are just trying to get people to believe they actually DO something for the obscene amounts of money they make. and before you say they work hard for it....vince mcmahon's (WWF/WWE fame) wife ran for govt office in her home state. the salary for the job was only about 85,000$/year (only!) - she said she would spend 55 MILLION DOLLARS of her own money to be elected. why would anyone spend 55million to make 85,000/year? CAUSE 85,000 IS ONLY THE HONEST PORTION.

Less governmental regulation, less taxation without representation, more listening to the people. we need to return to the (once great ) roots of this country....when someone served 4 years and went back to the farm/their job.

career politicians are causing the demise of our once great nation. people who believe there is a difference between democraps and republicraps (democrats and republicans) are only helping them. THERE IS NO DIFFERENCE -except which sides pockets get lined with cash. Neither party is interested in helping the country, just their own party- until we as americans wake up and realize we vote the same people into office each election and it gets worse- it will continue to get worse. a choice between a democrap and a republicrap is NO CHOICE AT ALL.

VOTE 3RD PARTY ALL THE TIME. the only wasted vote is one which gets cast for a major party. your voice will not be heard.

Jul 12, 2011, 8:39am Permalink
Kyle Couchman

Personally choices when voting sucks nowadays.... I try to assess for myself the person who seems to have the most realistic view. I dont vote for encumbents (yet) I would really like to see campaign finance turned on its ear and make elected positions available to everyone, not allow ANY money to be spent, imagine candidates actually having to meet people and try to convince them to vote for them.

Jul 12, 2011, 8:51am Permalink
Rob Wolfley

Chris, agreed.... to a point. You can't blame a machine for the decisions that ride operators and the victim made. Height requirements and the physical nature of the restraints are plain as day. Unless the ride transformed to hide the fact that you needed legs to stay on it. Then yes, i would blame the machine. There was no malfunction. It was human free will that caused this and nothing else. Saying people are to blame isn't judge jury and executioner in this case. In this case its a simple fact. Everyone involved that let the ride move with him on it, himself included, is to blame.

Jul 12, 2011, 1:06pm Permalink
Amy Platten

I think both the rider and the ride attendants are to blame for this accident. The ride operators can only recommend that a rider without legs not ride the ride, but it is ultimately the rider's decision on whether he or she get on the ride. How can you enforce that to a person especially if he or she is stubborn.

Jul 12, 2011, 5:49pm Permalink
Howard B. Owens

You simply don't allow the rider on. You shut down the ride if necessary to keep somebody off who does not meet the criteria for safety. If necessary, you call the cops. If you're an attendent, your number one priority is rider safety. If a person doesn't meet height requirements or has disabilities that will jeopardize him or herself and other riders, you don't let the person on the ride, period.

Jul 12, 2011, 5:56pm Permalink
Rob Wolfley

Howard, agreed. It makes me wonder though when he got into the seat how he and the ride op's didn't realize that just the part of his leg above the knee wasn't going to hold him in the ride.

Jul 12, 2011, 9:43pm Permalink

Authentically Local