So far, in looking over the latest campaign commercials uploaded to YouTube for the 26th Congressional race, they're really just a variation on a theme: Chris Lee shipped jobs to China (false) and Alice Kryzan is a "liberal trial lawyer" (silly).
Here's the latest from Lee's campaign:
The funny thing is, there is scant evidence from Lee, either in his campaign commercials, his web site or his public statements that he's anything other than just another Big Government Republican. He hasn't named one wasteful federal program he would cut, said how he would reign in the out-of-control Pentagon budget or scale back the federal bureaucracy. On his web site makes a veiled reference to pork, but railing against earmarks is just nonsense.
Given that earmarks make up less than 5 percent of the federal budget, eliminating them will do little to end deficit spending. Bigger, more drastic cuts than that need to be made. At least with earmarks, some of the wages convisicated by workers get returned to the districts the revenue came from.
The latest DCCC's ad attacking Lee is even less honest.
One line in the commercial that stands out: The press has called Lee's attacks on Kryzan "fiction."
My question is: Where? What press? Not any press I've been following. For ourselves, we've bashed Lee for his trite attack ads, but we haven't used the word fiction. It's hard to call something fiction that has no real substance to it.
UPDATE: Buffalo Bean interviewed Chris Lee. There isn't much to report from the Q&A. As usual, Lee doesn't say much. He doesn't divert from his talking points.
Howard, I'm still trying to
Howard, I'm still trying to find out why someone claiming to be working for Lee's campaign is interested in me? This "picture" of me at the GOP headquarters has become a source of personal attacks towards me with a local politician. Who the hell am I? His people are wasting time on someone like me? You're right. They need to spend their time on things that matter.