Skip to main content

Genesee County family court

The Batavian considers appeal after judge rules against request for transcript of Family Court motion

By Mike Pettinella

An attorney representing The Batavian is leaving the door open for an appeal after a Niagara County Family Court justice ruled against the online publication’s request for a transcript of a portion of a Genesee County Family Court hearing that dealt with a potential conflict of interest situation involving current Batavia City Court Judge Durin Rogers.

“We respectfully disagree with the Court’s decision and are considering our options for appeal,” said Heather E. Murray, managing attorney for the Local Journalism Project at the Cornell Law School First Amendment Clinic.

The Dec. 24 ruling by Niagara County Family Court Judge Erin P. DeLabio pertains to a hearing on Nov. 26, 2019 when DeLabio closed her courtroom to reporter Howard Owens, publisher of The Batavian.

After he was locked out of the hearing, Owens sought to obtain a transcript as he believed the public’s right to know outweighed any other factors since Rogers, representing the Genesee County Attorney’s office, also was serving as a sitting, part-time City Court judge while a defendant in the Family Court matter also was facing criminal charges in City Court.

Rogers was elected as the full-time City Court judge in November 2019 and sworn in Dec. 20, 2019.

Attorney Thomas Burns, who was representing a woman accused of hitting her child with an object, filed a motion alleging Rogers’ conflict of interest as the latter had access to City Court documents and was able to interact with other members of the county’s criminal justice system.

DeLabio, in her ruling, cited “confidentiality” concerns that outweighed The Batavian’s contention – as outlined in its “moving papers” – that the public has a right to know if an elected official is acting in an inappropriate manner.

The judge also wrote that it was “disconcerting” that the publication’s motion “was never served upon the very attorney (Rogers) who is the subject of the motion” and … as such, “service of this motion was defective.”

Owens said that DeLabio’s ruling has not changed The Batavian’s position on this issue.

His complete statement follows:

“As a local news publisher, I believe one of my roles in the community is to stand up for the First Amendment and public access to the public’s business, whether that’s through the state’s open meeting laws, public information laws, or the state’s provisions for ensuring courtrooms and court documents remain open to the public.

“Democracy does not work if the government can operate in secret.

“All of New York’s courts, including Family Court, are open to the public and the law is very clear that a courtroom can only be closed based on specific findings based on supporting evidence revealed in an open hearing on the matter.

“It’s been our position all along that Judge Erin DeLabio failed to follow the law when she closed her courtroom on Nov. 26, 2019. It is undisputed that the judge did not hold an opening hearing when she closed her courtroom.

“Since the portion of the hearing The Batavian sought to monitor involved an accusation made in court documents of a possible conflict of interest involving a public official, one who is no less than an officer of the court, we felt this matter was of significant public concern.

“And though this hearing happened more than a year ago, The Batavian’s position on this issue has not changed. With the help of the Cornell First Amendment Clinic, we appealed DeLabio’s ruling and felt we made a strong case.

“All we requested was a redacted transcript (to protect the privacy of the family involved in the case) so we were surprised and disappointed in DeLabio’s decision. As to her position regarding notice of service of Durin Rogers, this is a technical legal issue we will leave to our attorneys to address in our appeal. 

“Most troubling in her ruling is her statement, ‘The motion was heard AFTER (her emphasis) the local elections. Reporting anything that the (sic) Batavian thinks is relevant to the election after the fact, would have no impact on the election …’”

“Judge DeLabio is not employed by The Batavian. She is not an editor. She is a judge. It is not her place to pass editorial judgements on what is newsworthy.

“The public concern of this case has little to do with the election and everything to do with the fact that Durin Rogers is a public official in a position of public trust. This is why we reported on the issue in the first place and continue to maintain interest in the issue until it is publicly resolved. The public has a right to be informed on all matters involving a public official being accused of a conflict of interest. It is not incumbent upon Judge DeLabio to determine what is editorially relevant and her statement in the ruling amounts to prior restraint.

“We are appealing this ruling for the very fact that until the transcript is released, it remains a matter of public concern and is therefore newsworthy. It is newsworthy today and it will remain newsworthy in six months or two years, or however long it takes for justice to be served.

“We wish to see New York’s laws ensuring open courtrooms protected for the good of all citizens of New York.”

Previously:

Motion asks deputy county attorney to be removed from case over alleged conflict of interest

Judge blocks press from covering conflict-of-interest motion

Batavia attorney Tom Williams chosen as GOP's Family Court judge nominee on November ballot

By Billie Owens

Statement from Batavia-based attorney Thomas D. Williams:

"I am honored to announce that I have been selected by the Genesee County Republican Party as their candidate for Family Court Judge in the election to be held on Nov. 3.

"My extensive experience as an attorney in private practice for 35 years and as Batavia Town Court Justice since 2008 has prepared me for this important responsibility.

"Family Court addresses some of the most difficult problems our citizens face, including: custody and visitation rights of parents, grandparents and others; the abuse and neglect of children; juvenile delinquency; domestic violence; and myriad other matters critical to the well-being of our children, their families, and the community as a whole.

"In my career as an attorney and town justice, I have developed the skills needed to address these various issues. Much of my work has involved coordinating with the law enforcement and social services agencies in our community, and collaborating with the staff, fellow attorneys, and mediators that work within our Family Court System.

"It is my hope that my efforts will have a positive impact on people’s lives. I look forward to dedicating myself wholeheartedly to the challenges ahead and the hard work required to be the Family Court Judge the people of Genesee County deserve."

Thomas D. Williams
The Williams Law Firm
2 Court Street Plaza
Batavia

In God We Trust in the court rooms

By tracy davenport

I first met my childrens father when i was 16 yrs old and he was 33 yrs old. We had 3 kids. A girl that died at birth and then 2 boys who are now 12, 11. We split up and i had the boys till they were 3 and 4. I had got married and that marraige was not very good from the start. My ex-husband had kicked my oldest boy in the leg so i had to report it. He was arrested and jailed. But i was trying to work it out so i aloud him to come and visit and DSS did an unannounced visit and cought him there at the house. Because i vialoted an order of protection i was arrested for endangering the welfare of a child and charged with neglict in family court.

So i was forced to give custody to their father who is Daniel Cherry Sr. That was the start of the biggest mistake of my life. I put in the petition that he was to have the kids till i could be the mother that i need to be. I have done everything that DSS asked of me to do. (anger management, many parenting classes, mental health evaluation) just to mention a few things. I had every other weekend visition of the kids but had them every weekend. My ex- husband even did everything DSS asked him to do. But at that point Dan did everything he could to keep my husband away from the kids. So i had to have supervised visits. That went on for about 1 yrs or so. Dan even petition me back to court saying i slapped the youngest in the face. My visits were supervised at that time mind you. No matter what i do im always wrong in his eyes.

I have sinced divorced and have been out of that situation for 3 yrs now. I have moved out of the area. The best thing i could have ever done. I have got remarried. And have been next month for 2 yrs. now. But my current husban and i had moved back there to Batavia so i could seen more of the boys. But Dan just pushes me away from the boys and tells me to go back where we came from. So neither of us could find a job there in Batavia so we did move back home. Then i hear im a now good mother  and i chose a man over my boys. This is a no win situation.

So now i have unsupervised visits and dont see the boys much at all. Dan makes it so hard. After every visit he takes me back to court for something or another. He wants to say they have no family...but he makes it that way for them. My family dont see the boys cause he is always slandering me to them and they dont wanna hear it. I dont get the kids on their birthdays or till late on the holiday when the days is almost over. They dont call me unless they want money.  Or need something. I would do anything for the boys.

I love them so much and want more to do with them but Dan just pushes me away, and says that hes a single father and has no help but he made it that way...Does he want a medal or a chest to pin it on. These boys have been robbed of there childhood and cant just be kids. When we get them we get them new clothes but the oldest wont were them cause he dont wanna get them dirty. Dad will yell at him. I dont care go jump in a mud puddle. Thats what theres soap and water for. They even know how many foodstamps come into their house and how much the bills are. Children dont need to know that, thats the parents business..CHILDREN LEARN WHAT THEY LIVE. And they dont have a good example in life. Dans mother told me the reason she dont have nothing to do with the boys, its cause she dont want the heart ache of watching Dan destroy the boys. Little does she know thats what has happened.

We have a different way of life here where i live. You walk into the DSS building its empty. Why??? People know how to work here. My boys are not even gonna have good work ethics cause they dont have the role model in their life. And thats very sad. Every parent should want their children to do better than them. I have asked the boys do you ever want to come live with mom and i get told no. I dont  know why but they dont.

As far as In God We Trust being in the court room....they court system dont trust in god one bit..cause if they did they wouldnt pass judgement on others. i know i screwed up in life. But i have made my wrongs right to this day...I have paid my time for what i have done. I have enough of a reminder when i dont have the boys to put to bed at night or to wake up to in the morning. Thats enough for any mother to wake up.

I just want to have my boys back to show them a real life and not be on the system all their  life cause thats all they know... My husband works about 50 hrs a week. We just bought our first home and have a 3 month old baby boy that will know a real life and not be afraid of work. What is this world coming to?? All the boys are to him is his money maker from welfare...

He has made his lifew what it is. Everybody has trials and tribulation everyday.

Genesee County Court needs to trust in God if they are gonna have that on the wall.

Authentically Local